Stand With Crypto PAC

bipartisansuper pac

Really Controlled By

Coinbase via Brian Armstrong's vision — created as Coinbase's 'grassroots' arm; funded by Coinbase and crypto companies; 1.5M claimed members are primarily Coinbase app users

Total Raised (2024)

$10.0M

Total Spent (2024)

$8.0M

Cash on Hand

$2.0M

Key Races

1

Dark Money

25/100

Transparency

65/100

📖 The Story

Stand With Crypto PAC raised $10.0M in 2024, making it one of the most active PACs of the election cycle. Of that war chest, $8.0M was deployed — leaving $2.0M in reserve for future influence campaigns.

The money came from Coinbase and Various crypto companies, among others. Each contribution represents a bet — that the PAC's spending will shape outcomes favorable to the donor's interests.

The PAC spent its war chest on unknown. Every dollar aimed at tipping the scales.

Stand With Crypto PAC is Coinbase's grassroots-styled political operation — the soft-power complement to Fairshake's hard-power spending. While Fairshake drops tens of millions on advertising to defeat crypto-hostile candidates, Stand With Crypto claims to mobilize 1.5 million crypto holder "members" as voters, creating the appearance of a grassroots movement that happens to want exactly what the crypto industry's largest companies want. The PAC's "Crypto Voter Scorecard" rates every member of Congress on crypto-friendliness, creating an industry-driven endorsement system that tells crypto holders who to vote for and against. Members who receive an 'A' rating can expect industry support; those with an 'F' can expect to face Fairshake-funded opponents. This rating system, modeled on the NRA's decades-old approach, creates a disciplining mechanism that pushes legislators toward the crypto industry's preferred policies. The "grassroots" claim is the PAC's most debated feature. Stand With Crypto was created and funded by Coinbase — a publicly traded corporation — and its member list consists primarily of Coinbase users who clicked a button on the company's app. Whether 1.5 million people clicking a button constitutes a political movement or corporate astroturf depends on one's perspective, but the distinction matters because grassroots movements carry democratic legitimacy that corporate lobbying does not. The PAC spent $8 million in 2024, a fraction of Fairshake's $133 million, focusing on voter mobilization, issue advertising, and the scorecard system. Its real value to the crypto industry is as a legitimacy-laundering operation: when legislators face criticism for voting with the crypto industry, they can point to Stand With Crypto's 1.5 million "members" as evidence of constituent support rather than corporate capture.

🎭 Key Operatives

The people pulling the strings behind Stand With Crypto PAC.

B

Brian Armstrong

Coinbase CEO — created the initiative and drives strategy

K

Kara Calvert

Coinbase head of US policy — manages political operations

V

Various Coinbase lobbyists

Corporate lobbying team doubling as PAC strategists

💰 Where the Money Went

The most notable expenditures by Stand With Crypto PAC — every line represents an attempt to shape an election outcome.

RaceCandidateAmountOutcomeYear
Various pro-crypto racesBipartisan crypto-friendly candidates$8.0MMostly won (aligned with Fairshake spending)2024

💡 Did You Know?

Stand With Crypto's 1.5M members were acquired primarily through Coinbase's app — a button click, not a political commitment

The scorecard system is modeled on the NRA's 'A-to-F' ratings — creating the same legislative pressure mechanism for crypto

The PAC's real value is providing 'grassroots' cover for legislators voting with the crypto industry

At $8M spent, Stand With Crypto is a rounding error compared to Fairshake's $133M — but it provides the democratic legitimacy Fairshake can't

⚠️ Controversies

Legal challenges, ethical concerns, and public scrutiny.

Astroturf concerns — created and funded by Coinbase, not truly grassroots

1.5M 'members' are primarily Coinbase app users who clicked a button — not a genuine political movement

Crypto voter scorecards create industry-driven endorsement system that disciplines legislators

Legitimacy-laundering: provides democratic cover for what is fundamentally corporate lobbying

🔍 Transparency Score

65

How much donor information is publicly disclosed.

Moderate — some donors hidden.

🕳️ Dark Money Score

25

Hidden or untraceable funding sources.

Relatively transparent.

💸 Top Expenditures

Where the money actually went.

RecipientPurposeAmount
Various$4.0M
Various$3.0M
Various$1.0M

🏦 Top Donors

The individuals and entities bankrolling this PAC.

Coinbase$5.0M
Various crypto companies$5.0M

🏁 Key Races

Elections where this PAC concentrated its spending.

Mostly won

🔗 Connected Entities

CoinbaseFairshake PACBrian Armstrong

🔎 Related Investigations

crypto-congress-capture