Judicial Crisis Network / Concord Fund
Republicandark moneyReally Controlled By
Leonard Leo — operates as part of his interlocking dark money network; funded through Marble Freedom Trust and anonymous donors; rebranded from JCN to Concord Fund to obscure operations
Total Raised (2024)
$30.0M
Total Spent (2024)
$25.0M
Cash on Hand
$15.0M
Key Races
1
Dark Money
95/100
Transparency
5/100
📖 The Story
Judicial Crisis Network / Concord Fund raised $30.0M in 2024, making it one of the most significant political action committees of the election cycle. Of that war chest, $25.0M was deployed — leaving $15.0M in reserve for future influence campaigns.
The money came from Anonymous donors via Marble Freedom Trust, among others. Each contribution represents a bet — that the PAC's spending will shape outcomes favorable to the donor's interests.
The PAC spent its war chest on unknown. Every dollar aimed at tipping the scales.
With a dark money score of 95/100, a significant portion of this PAC's funding sources remain hidden from public view. This is among the most opaque PACs we track.
The Judicial Crisis Network — rebranded as the Concord Fund to obscure its increasingly controversial operations — is Leonard Leo's judicial confirmation machine and one of the most influential dark money organizations in American history. Operating almost entirely on anonymous donations flowing through Leo's network, JCN has spent tens of millions on advertising campaigns supporting the confirmations of Supreme Court justices Neil Gorsuch, Brett Kavanaugh, and Amy Coney Barrett, directly shaping the ideological composition of the highest court in the land. JCN's strategy during Supreme Court confirmation battles follows a consistent playbook: saturate media markets with advertising supporting the nominee, fund opposition research against critics, and deploy a network of conservative legal scholars and commentators to frame the nomination as mainstream and moderate. The organization spent approximately $10 million each on the Gorsuch and Kavanaugh confirmations and similar amounts on Barrett — spending that was funded entirely by anonymous donors whose identities may never be known. The rebranding from Judicial Crisis Network to Concord Fund was itself a tactical decision. As JCN's role in shaping the judiciary became increasingly well-known and controversial, the organization adopted a new name that revealed nothing about its mission. This is consistent with Leo's broader strategy of using innocuously named organizations to advance specific ideological goals — the 85 Fund, the Rule of Law Trust, the Marble Freedom Trust — names designed to tell the public nothing about what these organizations actually do. JCN's funding comes almost entirely from Marble Freedom Trust and other entities in Leo's network. As a 501(c)(4), JCN has no obligation to disclose its donors, meaning the public cannot know who is paying for the advertising campaigns that shape public opinion about judicial nominees. The organization has shaped the federal judiciary more than any entity except the Federalist Society itself, with six of nine current Supreme Court justices having been supported by organizations in Leo's network. The Supreme Court's own ethics scandals — including Clarence Thomas's undisclosed trips funded by Harlan Crow and Samuel Alito's controversial flag displays — have drawn attention to the broader ecosystem of dark money that surrounds the judiciary. JCN's role in this ecosystem — funding confirmations, supporting friendly legal challenges that reach the Court, and defending justices against ethics criticism — creates a troubling circularity: dark money helps install justices who then rule in ways that benefit dark money interests.
🎭 Key Operatives
The people pulling the strings behind Judicial Crisis Network / Concord Fund.
Leonard Leo
Controller — part of his interlocking dark money network
Carrie Severino
JCN/Concord Fund president and public face
Gary Marx
Executive director of the Judicial Confirmation Network (predecessor)
💰 Where the Money Went
The most notable expenditures by Judicial Crisis Network / Concord Fund — every line represents an attempt to shape an election outcome.
| Race | Candidate | Amount | Outcome | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gorsuch confirmation campaign | Neil Gorsuch | $10.0M | Confirmed to Supreme Court | 2017 |
| Kavanaugh confirmation campaign | Brett Kavanaugh | $12.0M | Confirmed despite controversy | 2018 |
| Barrett confirmation campaign | Amy Coney Barrett | $10.0M | Confirmed in record time | 2020 |
| Federal judicial nominations (ongoing) | Conservative federal judges | $25.0M | Ongoing | 2024 |
💡 Did You Know?
JCN rebranded to 'Concord Fund' — a name that tells the public absolutely nothing about its mission
The organization spent approximately $10M+ on each Supreme Court confirmation — funded entirely by anonymous donors
Six of nine current Supreme Court justices were supported by Leo's network — the most consequential political operation in American law
Dark money helped confirm justices who then ruled in Citizens United and other cases that protect dark money — a perfect feedback loop
JCN's advertising during Kavanaugh's contentious confirmation was funded by donors whose identities will never be disclosed
⚠️ Controversies
Legal challenges, ethical concerns, and public scrutiny.
Complete dark money funding — no donor disclosure despite spending tens of millions shaping the judiciary
Rebranded from JCN to Concord Fund specifically to obscure its operations and avoid scrutiny
Part of Leo's interlocking dark money network — money flows through multiple entities to avoid transparency
Supports justices who then rule in ways that protect dark money — a self-reinforcing cycle
Funded confirmation campaigns for 3 of the justices who overturned Roe v. Wade
🔍 Transparency Score
How much donor information is publicly disclosed.
Low transparency — significant dark money.
🕳️ Dark Money Score
Hidden or untraceable funding sources.
Most funding sources hidden.
💸 Top Expenditures
Where the money actually went.
| Recipient | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Various media firms | — | $15.0M |
| Various | — | $7.0M |
| Various | — | $3.0M |
🏦 Top Donors
The individuals and entities bankrolling this PAC.
🏁 Key Races
Elections where this PAC concentrated its spending.