Fairshake PAC
bipartisansuper pacReally Controlled By
Marc Andreessen (a16z), Brian Armstrong (Coinbase), and Brad Garlinghouse (Ripple) — the crypto industry's big three provide the bulk of funding and strategic direction
Total Raised (2024)
$193.0M
Total Spent (2024)
$133.0M
Cash on Hand
$116.0M
Key Races
3
Dark Money
40/100
Transparency
70/100
📖 The Story
Fairshake PAC raised $193.0M in 2024, making it one of the most powerful super PACs of the election cycle. Of that war chest, $133.0M was deployed — leaving $116.0M in reserve for future influence campaigns.
The money came from Coinbase, Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and Ripple, among others. Each contribution represents a bet — that the PAC's spending will shape outcomes favorable to the donor's interests.
The PAC spent its war chest on unknown, unknown and unknown. Every dollar aimed at tipping the scales.
Fairshake PAC is the crypto industry's political juggernaut — a $193 million war chest that achieved a 91% win rate in the races it contested in 2024, making it one of the most successful super PACs in modern political history. Funded primarily by Coinbase ($25 million), Andreessen Horowitz ($70 million), and Ripple ($25 million), Fairshake operates bipartisanly — targeting anyone who threatens crypto-friendly regulation regardless of party affiliation. The PAC's strategy is deceptively simple: identify candidates who oppose crypto-friendly legislation, fund their opponents with overwhelming spending, and never mention cryptocurrency in the advertisements. Like AIPAC's strategy, Fairshake's ads attack candidates on unrelated issues — Social Security, crime, local concerns — while the actual motivation is purely about crypto regulation. Voters seeing these ads have no way of knowing that the real reason millions are being spent is to protect the crypto industry from regulation. Marc Andreessen, the venture capital billionaire who provided $70 million through his firm a16z, has been the PAC's most important funder. Andreessen's political evolution — from Obama supporter to vocal Trump backer — mirrors the broader Silicon Valley rightward shift, driven partly by frustration with Democratic regulation of technology and finance. His podcast and public appearances have given Fairshake an intellectual framework: framing crypto regulation as government overreach that threatens American innovation. The PAC's first major loss came in the March 2026 Illinois primary, where its spending failed to defeat a candidate who explicitly campaigned against crypto industry money in politics. The loss may signal emerging voter backlash against corporate money overwhelming individual races — a vulnerability that could grow as Fairshake deploys its $116 million war chest in 2026 midterms. Fairshake's $116 million remaining cash on hand makes it the best-funded PAC heading into 2026 — more money than most party committees have for the entire cycle. This war chest gives the crypto industry the ability to intervene in any race at any time, creating a deterrent effect: candidates know that opposing crypto legislation means risking millions in attack ads funded by an industry with seemingly unlimited resources.
🎭 Key Operatives
The people pulling the strings behind Fairshake PAC.
Marc Andreessen
Largest funder via a16z ($70M)
Brian Armstrong
Coinbase CEO, major funder and strategic driver
Brad Garlinghouse
Ripple CEO, major funder ($25M)
Josh Vlasto
Senior advisor — runs PAC messaging and ad strategy
💰 Where the Money Went
The most notable expenditures by Fairshake PAC — every line represents an attempt to shape an election outcome.
| Race | Candidate | Amount | Outcome | Year |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OH Senate | Bernie Moreno | $40.0M | Won — flipped seat from Sherrod Brown | 2024 |
| NY-16 Primary | George Latimer (vs Bowman) | $2.0M | Won | 2024 |
| Various House races | Pro-crypto candidates (bipartisan) | $50.0M | 91% win rate | 2024 |
| IL Primary 2026 | Undisclosed | $5.0M | Lost — first major defeat | 2026 |
💡 Did You Know?
Fairshake's 91% win rate is one of the highest for any super PAC in modern history
$116M war chest heading into 2026 is more money than most state party committees have for an entire cycle
Marc Andreessen's $70M through a16z makes him the largest single funder — a venture capitalist buying regulatory outcomes
The PAC's first loss in 2026 Illinois was the first significant defeat for the crypto political machine
Fairshake operates bipartisanly — equally willing to fund Democratic or Republican candidates based solely on crypto stance
⚠️ Controversies
Legal challenges, ethical concerns, and public scrutiny.
Corporate money overwhelming individual races — $193M from three companies buying Congress
Crypto industry buying regulatory outcomes allegation — candidates vote on crypto bills after receiving millions
First major loss in IL 2026 primary may signal voter backlash against crypto industry money
Ads never mention crypto — attacking candidates on unrelated issues to hide the real motivation
91% win rate means the crypto industry now has effective veto power over crypto-hostile legislation
🔍 Transparency Score
How much donor information is publicly disclosed.
High transparency.
🕳️ Dark Money Score
Hidden or untraceable funding sources.
Moderate dark money.
💸 Top Expenditures
Where the money actually went.
| Recipient | Purpose | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Various | — | $80.0M |
| Various | — | $40.0M |
| Various | — | $13.0M |
🏦 Top Donors
The individuals and entities bankrolling this PAC.
🏁 Key Races
Elections where this PAC concentrated its spending.