EMILY's List

Democrathybrid

Really Controlled By

Laphonza Butler (former president, now Senator), currently led by Jessica Mackler — driven by 100,000+ individual donors rather than mega-donors; genuinely grassroots compared to most PACs

Total Raised (2024)

$80.0M

Total Spent (2024)

$70.0M

Cash on Hand

$10.0M

Key Races

1

Dark Money

15/100

Transparency

70/100

📖 The Story

EMILY's List raised $80.0M in 2024, making it one of the most powerful super PACs of the election cycle. Of that war chest, $70.0M was deployed — leaving $10.0M in reserve for future influence campaigns.

The money came from Individual women donors (100,000+) and Various Democratic mega-donors, among others. Each contribution represents a bet — that the PAC's spending will shape outcomes favorable to the donor's interests.

The PAC spent its war chest on unknown. Every dollar aimed at tipping the scales.

EMILY's List — the acronym stands for "Early Money Is Like Yeast" (it makes the dough rise) — is the original women's political fundraising powerhouse, and one of the oldest and most transparent PACs in American politics. Founded in 1985, it bundles donations from over 100,000 individual donors to support pro-choice Democratic women candidates, operating as a hybrid PAC that both contributes directly to candidates and runs independent expenditure campaigns. The Dobbs decision overturning Roe v. Wade in 2022 transformed EMILY's List from an important but niche operation into one of the most relevant political organizations in America. Fundraising surged as reproductive rights became a dominant political issue, and EMILY's List-backed candidates found that running on abortion rights was a winning strategy in swing districts. The organization's candidate recruitment pipeline — identifying and training women candidates from local office through Congress — became critical infrastructure for the Democratic Party's response to Dobbs. With $80 million in 2024 spending, EMILY's List is the largest PAC dedicated to electing women. Its fundraising model is distinctive: rather than relying on a few mega-donors, EMILY's List bundles thousands of small contributions from its 100,000+ member network. This gives the organization a claim to genuine grassroots support that mega-donor-funded super PACs cannot make. The model also creates a broad base of politically engaged women who serve as volunteers, advocates, and candidates themselves. EMILY's List has been criticized for supporting only Democratic women, declining to endorse pro-choice Republican women. This partisan stance has intensified since Dobbs, as virtually all Republican-appointed judges voted to overturn Roe and virtually all Republican legislators have supported abortion restrictions. The organization argues that supporting Republican women candidates would legitimize a party that is actively restricting reproductive rights, while critics argue that cross-party support for pro-choice women would be more effective at protecting abortion access. The organization's transparency — both in its fundraising (bundled small donations) and its mission (explicitly supporting pro-choice Democratic women) — makes it one of the most straightforward PACs in a landscape dominated by dark money and hidden agendas. When EMILY's List runs an ad, voters know exactly who is paying for it and why.

🎭 Key Operatives

The people pulling the strings behind EMILY's List.

J

Jessica Mackler

Current president running operations

L

Laphonza Butler

Former president (now U.S. Senator)

E

Ellen Malcolm

Founder (1985) — created the organization and its bundling model

S

Stephanie Schriock

Former president who expanded the organization post-2016

💰 Where the Money Went

The most notable expenditures by EMILY's List — every line represents an attempt to shape an election outcome.

RaceCandidateAmountOutcomeYear
Various competitive racesPro-choice Democratic women candidates$70.0MMixed — significant gains post-Dobbs2024

💡 Did You Know?

EMILY's List stands for 'Early Money Is Like Yeast' — it makes the dough rise

The organization's 100,000+ donor network makes it one of the genuinely grassroots PACs in a landscape of mega-donor operations

Post-Dobbs, EMILY's List fundraising and relevance surged — the decision energized the organization more than any event in its 40-year history

EMILY's List has helped elect over 1,300 women to office since 1985 — from local school boards to the U.S. Senate

Its transparency score is among the highest of any PAC — small donations with clear policy motivation

⚠️ Controversies

Legal challenges, ethical concerns, and public scrutiny.

Only supports Democrats — criticized for not endorsing pro-choice Republicans

Internal debates about endorsement criteria and ideological purity

Some argue the partisan stance limits the organization's effectiveness in protecting reproductive rights

🔍 Transparency Score

70

How much donor information is publicly disclosed.

High transparency.

🕳️ Dark Money Score

15

Hidden or untraceable funding sources.

Relatively transparent.

💸 Top Expenditures

Where the money actually went.

RecipientPurposeAmount
Various$40.0M
Various$20.0M
Various$10.0M

🏦 Top Donors

The individuals and entities bankrolling this PAC.

Individual women donors (100,000+)$50.0M
Various Democratic mega-donors$30.0M

🏁 Key Races

Elections where this PAC concentrated its spending.

Mixed

🔗 Connected Entities

Democratic women candidatesPlanned Parenthood Action