Lockheed Martin
corporationDefense / Aerospace · 116.0K employees
Lobbying (2024)
$12.8M
Political Spending
$6.0M
Gov Contracts
$50.0B
Revolving Door
62
75 lobbyists
📖 The Story
Lockheed Martin spent $12.8M lobbying Washington in 2024, deploying an army of 75 registered lobbyists to influence federal policy. That figure places it among the most politically active defense / aerospace entities in the country — spending roughly $1.1M per month just to ensure lawmakers hear its message.
The company's influence extends beyond paid lobbyists. Lockheed Martin employs 62 former government officials — people who once wrote the rules and now help Lockheed Martin navigate them. This "revolving door" between industry and government is one of the most potent, and least visible, tools of corporate influence in Washington.
Meanwhile, the federal government paid Lockheed Martin $50.0B in contracts during 2024. Critics argue this creates a troubling feedback loop: the company lobbies for policies that benefit its business, then wins government contracts from the very agencies it lobbied.
In total political spending — including PAC contributions, direct donations, and independent expenditures — Lockheed Martin deployed $6.0M during the 2024 cycle. Every dollar is an investment, and in Washington, investments are expected to produce returns.
Lockheed Martin is America's largest defense contractor and the purest expression of the military-industrial complex that President Eisenhower warned about in 1961. With $67 billion in annual revenue — over 70% from government contracts — the company's business model is literally the Pentagon's budget. Every dollar increase in defense spending flows disproportionately to Lockheed, and every dollar cut threatens its bottom line. This creates an alignment between Lockheed's corporate interests and perpetual military expansion that has shaped American foreign policy for decades. The F-35 Lightning II program is the centerpiece of Lockheed's political strategy and the most expensive weapons system in human history. At a total lifecycle cost exceeding $1.7 trillion, the F-35 is more expensive than the GDP of all but a handful of countries. The program has been plagued by cost overruns, schedule delays, and performance issues — a 2021 GAO report documented over 800 unresolved deficiencies. Yet cancellation is politically impossible, and this is by design. Lockheed strategically placed F-35 parts suppliers in 45 states, ensuring that nearly every member of Congress has constituents whose jobs depend on the program. This geographic distribution is often called "political engineering" — designing a weapons system's supply chain to maximize congressional support rather than to optimize military effectiveness. Lockheed's revolving door is the most extensive in the defense industry, with 62 documented connections between the company and government positions. Retired generals and admirals routinely join Lockheed's board or consulting network, where they leverage their Pentagon relationships to sell weapons systems to their former colleagues. The company employs over 75 registered lobbyists — more than some countries have diplomats in Washington — many of them former Pentagon acquisition officials who understand the defense procurement process from the inside. The company's $12.8 million in 2024 lobbying and $6 million in political spending target Armed Services Committee members and defense appropriators from both parties, because defense spending is the most bipartisan line item in the federal budget. Lockheed PAC donations go to every member of the Armed Services Committee regardless of party, creating a blanket of influence across the committees that determine its fate. Beyond the F-35, Lockheed's portfolio includes the Trident II D5 submarine-launched ballistic missile ($50 billion program), THAAD missile defense systems ($15 billion), and an expanding space systems division building GPS satellites and classified reconnaissance systems for the Space Force and NRO. Each of these programs has its own network of congressional supporters, subcontractors, and lobbyists, creating multiple redundant channels of political influence. In 2025, with the defense budget hitting $1.06 trillion when supplementals are included, Lockheed's political investments continue to pay extraordinary returns. The company's stock price has consistently outperformed the market during periods of military escalation, and its dividend has increased for 21 consecutive years — a track record built on the reliable growth of defense spending that Lockheed's lobbying operation helps ensure.
👔 Key Executives
The people steering Lockheed Martin's political machine — and their connections to power.
Jim Taiclet
Chairman, President & CEO
West Point graduate; former Army officer; regular presence at Congressional defense hearings; leads company's AI and 5G military strategy
Frank St. John
COO
Oversees all four business areas; extensive relationships with Pentagon acquisition officials; manages F-35 program strategy
Greg Ulmer
EVP, Aeronautics
Runs the F-35 program — the largest defense program in history; directly interfaces with Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps leadership
Various Board Members
Former Generals & Admirals
Board consistently includes retired 3- and 4-star generals who provide direct connections to current Pentagon leadership
🏆 What They Bought
Policy outcomes that aligned with Lockheed Martin's lobbying priorities. Correlation isn't causation — but when you spend millions lobbying for something and then get it, the pattern speaks for itself.
| Policy | Year | What Happened |
|---|---|---|
| F-35 Program Continuation | 2024 | Despite 800+ unresolved deficiencies and massive cost overruns, F-35 production continues at full rate with bipartisan support — parts in 45 states make cancellation impossible |
| Defense Budget Increases | 2025 | Defense budget reached $1.06T with supplementals; Lockheed receives the largest share of Pentagon contracts |
| International F-35 Sales | 2023 | State Department approved F-35 sales to multiple allies; each international sale extends the program's life and congressional support |
| Space Force Establishment | 2019 | Lockheed lobbied for the creation of the Space Force, which created a new military branch and a new budget line for Lockheed's space systems |
💡 Did You Know?
The F-35 program's $1.7T lifetime cost exceeds the GDP of Canada, Australia, or Spain
F-35 parts are manufactured in 45 states and Puerto Rico — a deliberate strategy to ensure every senator has a reason to support the program
Lockheed's 75+ lobbyists outnumber many countries' entire diplomatic presence in Washington
The company's PAC donates to every single member of the Armed Services Committee, regardless of party
Lockheed's stock has increased 21 consecutive years of dividends, making defense spending one of the most reliable investments in America
⚠️ Controversies & Scandals
Public controversies, legal actions, and ethical concerns involving Lockheed Martin.
F-35 cost overruns: $400B+ total program cost with 800+ unresolved deficiencies documented by GAO
Parts in 45 states is 'political engineering' — designing supply chains for congressional support, not military effectiveness
62 revolving door connections — retired generals joining board to sell to former colleagues
Consistent cost overruns across programs yet continues to win new contracts
International arms sales to authoritarian regimes with human rights concerns
Lobbied for increased defense spending while paying an effective tax rate lower than many small businesses
🚪 The Revolving Door
2 individuals with connections between Lockheed Martin and government.
📋 Key Government Contracts
Total contract value: $50.0B.
| Agency | Description | Value | Year |
|---|---|---|---|
| DoD/USAF/Navy/Marines | — | $400.0B | — |
| Navy | — | $50.0B | — |
| Space Force/NRO | — | $30.0B | — |
| MDA | — | $15.0B | — |
📌 Key Issues
Policy areas where Lockheed Martin concentrates its lobbying firepower.
🎯 Top Recipients
Politicians who received the most from Lockheed Martin in 2024.
🔄 Money Flow & Relationships
Every line represents money or influence.
🔎 Related Investigations
PowerMap investigations that reference Lockheed Martin.